|
Lewitt is an Ashoka Fellow, Acumen Fellow and Teach for India Fellow and earned his Bachelors in Chemical Engineering.
Started in 2013, Life-Lab makes science education fun and engaging for children and builds the capacities of teachers to create experience-based learning environments. Life-Lab, having an Avengers team of over 38 is currently working with more than 1,300 schools, impacting 4.5 lakh children across 6 states.
ET: In your opinion, what is the current status of imparting science education in India? Can you also throw some light on experiential learning in this regard?
LS: The question of instituting quality and moving away from the detrimental practice of rote learning has plagued the Indian education sector for over two decades now. Evidently, a need for practices to improve the fractured process of imparting education in classrooms has been felt. Research confirms that students who practice what they are learning in a hands-on environment can often retain three and half times as much as opposed to just sitting in a lecture room and listening intently. Activity-Based Learning (ABL) or Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) has for long been a proven pedagogy to improve quality of education and has been endorsed by several leading national and international institutions like the UNICEF and the Government of India.
Unfortunately, despite the pedagogy existing for several decades now, it has faced significant limitations in scaling and being practiced in schools across India. Most successful initiatives have stayed limited to private/alternative schools. Efforts by large institutions have also met limited success. For example, UNICEF's initiative in India has stayed limited to 270 schools over 12 years and the Indian government's efforts have failed to scale beyond the first segment of primary education (grade 2). As a result, classrooms rooted in enquiry-based learning remain far from a reality. Efforts by Chief Strategy Officers (CSO) through training of teachers on toolkits have also failed to integrate the method into the learning process. Activities are conducted as a practical extension of the theory and not as a means of arriving at the theory.
A critical gap that all efforts have failed in scaling is in enabling teachers to transition to this new pedagogy. Practicing ABL or IBL requires a deeper conceptual clarity and competency on part of the teachers.
However, teachers, especially those in low-income schools, are products of traditional methods of education and the Central Teacher Eligibility Test is increasingly revealing how ill-equipped teachers are; only 5.6% of the teachers passed the test in 2014. A growing number of teachers share that they feel threatened because they do not understand how to create an enquiry-based classroom. Unless the teachers are taught, there is no way for the children to experience this way of learning. The teachers have traditionally only been trained in demonstrating the tool and managing behaviour - the aspect that is left out is the skill to facilitate a conversation that draws questions out of the kids. There is a need for solutions that empathetically support the shift in mind-sets of teachers and enhance their skills and knowledge to function as facilitators to the child's learning process at scale.
While the market has been flooded with models that can be used as tools for ABL, they are not mapped to the course content. The toolkits contain experiments that help learn concepts (such as force and pressure) but do not tailor them to fit the curricula of various grades, putting further demands on an already stretched teacher to map these new tools to his lesson plans. Models are also often built only for the teachers as a demonstration tool. The teacher fears damage to material and the children are unable to have the opportunity to work with experiments. The expectation on the children is to create their own working models; however, there is no information supplied that can help either students or teachers to identify materials from their surroundings that may be used to do so.
ET: How can various stakeholders (teachers, government, etc.) help in making science education accessible and fun?
LS: For children, joyful learning environment in classrooms deepens conceptual understanding, enhances science learning outcomes, reduces stress, makes child curious, and inspires child to be creative-problem solvers and critical thinkers.
Taking a system level approach, key stakeholders that play an important role to create the above experience for children are parents, school system, government, corporate and philanthropic foundations.
Parent's needs are fulfilled when children demonstrate enthusiasm towards learning, effectively articulate his/her learning experiences, future aspirations and dreams, come up with new innovations, get recognition from external stakeholders. All these aspects enhance the perceived face value for parents that their child is getting good quality science education.
Thus, it becomes the fundamental responsibility of the school system, government, corporate and philanthropic foundations, NGOs and social enterprises in education to collaborate, invest in the pedagogical research, and learning environments required to make children future ready. Currently, 80% of the education budget goes for teachers' salaries and 90% of the corporate and philanthropic grants in school education is allocated for replication of the model that innovates majorly in delivery mechanism. That is a major paradox, since the need of the hour is research backed models that completely flips the way teaching-learning is conceived, strategized, executed and implemented.
ET: Technology is reaching classrooms at a pace like never before. What are your views on digital learning aids and the impact on students?
LS: Technology as a tool is catalysing the process of knowledge acquisition for teachers, parents and children. We are living in a time where technology has literally made the accessibility of knowledge free, which could not have been imagined few decades back. Imaginative and mesmerizing visual content, adaptive tests, curated and customized content delivery and data backed pedagogical techniques provided to teachers and parents are some of the positives of technology-based interventions in classrooms and at homes. It makes technology a powerful, and addictive tool. However, children like flowers, need a gardener which, in a school system space, is a teacher and at home, parents. Unfortunately, and increasingly though, strengthening and empowering teachers and parents is taking a back seat and technology is perceived as a co-driver to bridge the teachers' knowledge and skill gap. And in parents' case, technology is becoming a filler for lack of time that parents can constructively provide to their child. Thus, focus needs to be on equipping the teachers and parents to intelligently and responsibly use technology as one of the tools, than the only tool! At max, technology can serve as an antibiotic; however, it is not a solution or a curative process for the problem. There cannot be a substitute for time, care, gentleness and humane touch that a child needs for holistic development to be a responsible, participative citizen having the compassionate heart and an acumen to solve problems for the welfare and creation of a progressive society.
ET: What is Life-Labs' approach to science and how has it been making science fun for all?
LS: When the majority population is scientifically illiterate, it not only aggravates inequity but also excludes this majority from making decisions and create the meaningful impact on their environment. Thus, science learning must be seen as necessary for the full realization of human beings. To address the increasing needs for universal access to quality science learning in schools, numerous pedagogical experiments were conducted. These experiments, based on the foundations of fun, engagement, conceptual understanding, creativity, and problem-solving, became Life-Lab. The team's acumen for design thinking, and panache for storytelling, led Life-Lab to take the approach of Activity-Based Science Learning (ABSL). To immerse 440 million Indian school going children with ABSL approach, hundreds of Life-Lab models are required. Thus, Life-Lab has adopted a cyclic three-fold strategy to achieve Science Education for All. For creating proof-points, invest CSR and philanthropic foundations, to develop cutting-edge pedagogical research that integrates Science with Social-Emotional learning and pilot these innovations in government schools. For growth, validating the proof-points across diverse contexts, and regions by collaborating and co-working with NGOs, and like-minded entrepreneurs. For scale and to institutionalize sustainable behavioural changes in science teaching-learning practices, Life-Lab works with state governments as a knowledge partner to strengthen the education machinery across the delivery chain.
In FY 2019-20, Life-Lab is impacting 4.5 lakh children in collaboration with the Delhi Government (Department of Education), and Government Institutions like FSSAI, Kerala Development and Innovation Strategic Council; and in collaboration by working with more than 15 NGOs and 12 Corporates. In the next 5 years, Life-Lab will impact close to a million children by strengthening the three-fold approach and provide consulting solutions for state governments to enhance the quality of science education with special focus on rural India.
ET: What inspired you to start Life-Labs? What strides has the company accomplished so far?
LS: From the time I became conscious, my dream and end goal in life was getting an American Job, a German car and a beautiful Indian wife. An engineering degree would have done the trick and made it quick. So be it. Naivety at its best, and finally at 17, boom - college happened. Best things (and even bad things) happen when unchained and free in life. Life increasingly became another '5 Point Someone'. Realization struck. It was liberating. My naive dream was never mine! It was my parents'. And, thus I became a wanderer and a traveler. Not doing touristy stuff but experimenting. Romantic threshold came at the age of 20 when I became part of Jagriti Yatra. Life became sweeter ever since.
Seeds of attraction towards the development sector were born during Jagriti Yatra. And, it became a sapling with my decision to join the Teach for India fellowship at the age of 23. For the kind of notorious and rebellious student I was, my teachers and professors used to quip jokingly that one day I would become a teacher! Their blessings turned real. However, those two years of classroom explorations with my 30 kids led me to believe that learning need not be a torture, the teacher need not be a ring master and the classroom need not be a circus stage. Thus, Life-Lab was born.
Today I am an educator, friend, trainer, innovator, manager, entrepreneur and at times an office-boy donning different hats at Life-Lab which started in 2013 with a vision to create inclusive classrooms that would make learning fun and experience-based for children.
back to top ^
|